Child-Related Domestic Violence Offences - NSW

Child-related domestic and family violence offences are taken extremely seriously in NSW. Police will often charge quickly — sometimes on limited information — when a child is present, affected, or alleged to be at risk. These matters can move fast, involve strict bail conditions, and have consequences for parenting arrangements and family life.

At Lenz Legal, we act only for the accused. You are presumed innocent unless and until the prosecution proves the charge beyond reasonable doubt.

What Are “Child-Related” Domestic Violence Offences?

Child-related domestic and family violence offences are taken extremely seriously in NSW. In practice, a domestic violence offence becomes child-related when police allege a child was present, witnessed the incident, was affected, or was placed at risk of harm.

When an offence becomes child-related

  • A child is alleged to have been present,
  • A child is alleged to have witnessed the incident,
  • A child is said to be the subject of a threat, or
  • Police allege the child was put at risk of harm.

These cases may involve:

Offences commonly treated as child-related

Common assault (DV)

Stalking or intimidation 

Threats or causing fear of harm 

Destroy or damage property (DV) 

Choking, suffocation or strangulation 

Coercive control

Contravene / breach AVO where a child is protected under the order

A child does not need to be physically harmed for the charge to be treated as a child-related offences.

Police treatment of child-related DV allegation

Child-related DV allegations are treated as high-risk matters. In practice, this often results in:

  • Charges being laid even where the primary complainant does not want police action
  • Immediate applications for a provisional AVO protecting the child
  • Strict bail conditions affecting where you can live and who you can contact
  • Mandatory reporting to child protection agencies in some circumstances
  • Police prioritising perceived risk over a detailed assessment of the evidence

This approach can lead to charges based on:

  • Incomplete or one-sided accounts
  • Statements made during high-stress incidents
  • Misunderstandings between adults witnessed by a child
  • Allegations arising in the context of separation or parenting disputes
  • Misinterpretation of a child’s behaviour or statements

A key part of our role is ensuring the court sees the full context, not just the police summary.

What Police Must Prove

Each offence has specific legal elements, but in a child-related DV case the prosecution usually must prove:

1. That the alleged act occurred

Such as an assault, threat, act of damage, intimidation, or alleged pattern of behaviour.

2. That you were responsible

This requires actual admissible evidence — not assumptions, misunderstandings, or hearsay.

3. That a domestic relationship existed

Between you and the complainant or affected adult.

4. That a child was present, affected, or put at risk

Police must prove the child was:

  • present at the time of the alleged conduct, or
  • exposed to the alleged conduct, or
  • directly threatened, or
  • placed in danger (based on evidence, not assumption)

5. Any additional elements of the underlying offence

For example:

If the prosecution cannot prove every required element, you must be found not guilty.

How These Allegations Commonly Arise

Child-related domestic violence allegations often arise in situations such as:

  • Arguments between adults in the home
  • Disputes during or after separation
  • Allegations made during family law or parenting proceedings
  • Discussions overheard or witnessed by children
  • Highly emotional situations escalated by stress, alcohol, or external pressures
  • Mandatory reporting by police after attending an unrelated incident

A child’s presence frequently leads police to err on the side of caution, even where the evidence is incomplete, inconsistent, or disputed.

Evidence Police Commonly Rely On

Prosecutors typically rely on:

  • Body-worn video from the scene
  • The complainant’s statement
  • Statements made by children (direct or indirect)
  • Photographs of the home or any alleged damage
  • 000 recordings
  • Text messages, call logs or social media conversations
  • Family Court material (in limited circumstances)

Where this evidence can fall short 

Common weaknesses we identify include:

  • Children’s statements being interpreted through adults
  • Accounts changing after separation or legal disputes
  • Body-worn video not supporting the allegation
  • No evidence of risk or exposure to the child
  • One-sided or incomplete versions of events
  • Behaviour misinterpreted due to stress, noise or chaos
  • Evidence that does not meet the legal threshold for the underlying offence

These matters often involve context gaps, and our defence strategy focuses on exposing those gaps clearly.


Possible Defences and Ways These Matters Are Resolved

Depending on the evidence and the specific offence, options may include:

Defending the charge at hearing

A defended hearing may be appropriate where allegations are denied, evidence is weak, or a legal defence applies — such as:

  • Self-defence
  • Accident
  • Lack of intent
  • Duress
  • Mistaken factual assumption
  • Insufficient evidence about the child’s presence, impact or alleged risk

Negotiating with the prosecution

We may be able to:

  • Withdraw child-related components
  • Downgrade charges
  • Amendment to the police facts
  • Remove or amend risk-related allegations that are unsupported by evidence

Negotiation is common in child-related DV matters because early police summaries often overstate risk based on limited information.

Entering a plea on a proper factual basis

Where the evidence supports a plea, but the police facts are disputed or overstated, the focus shifts to ensuring the agreed facts are accurate and to minimising penalty.

Seeking non-conviction outcomes

In appropriate matters, the court may deal with the matter by:

  • Conditional Release Order (CRO) without conviction
  • Community-based orders without recording a conviction

Non-conviction outcomes are often achievable in appropriate child-related matters, depending on the evidence, risk assessment and your personal circumstances.

The best pathway is determined only after a full review of the brief.

Sentencing and Penalties in Child-Related DV Matters

Penalties depend on the underlying offence, the presence or absence of harm, and whether the child was exposed to risk.

Courts consider:

  • The nature of the alleged conduct
  • The degree of exposure or impact on the child
  • Your personal circumstances and history
  • Steps taken towards rehabilitation
  • Any family law or child protection considerations

Possible Sentencing Outcomes

  • Conditional Release Order (CRO) without conviction
  • Conditional Release Order with conviction
  • Community-based orders
  • Fines (where appropriate)
  • In more serious cases, full-time imprisonment

Outcomes range from non-conviction orders to full-time imprisonment in the most serious cases.

Courts must assess child-related allegations cautiously, but they also consider the full context, the reliability of the evidence, the absence of harm, and any steps you have taken towards rehabilitation.

Why Early Legal Advice Matters

Acting early allows us to:

  • Prevent statements to police that may later be used against you
  • Address bail or AVO conditions affecting children
  • Gather evidence while it is still available
  • Identify weaknesses before the prosecution position solidifies
  • Prepare you for interviews, court dates and negotiations

These are high-stakes matters with real consequences. Having a defence lawyer engaged early makes a substantial difference.

How Lenz Legal Can Help

When you come to Lenz Legal, we will:

  • Liisten carefully to your account and what has been alleged
  • Explain the law clearly, including what the prosecution must prove
  • Advise you on AVO conditions and child-related restrictions
  • Build a defence strategy or plea strategy tailored to your case
  • Negotiate with police and prosecutors where appropriate
  • Represent you in court and fight to secure the best possible outcome

You will deal directly with an experienced criminal defence lawyer, not a junior or call centre.

Guides to Related Domestic Violence Offences

Common Assault – DV

Choking, Suffocation or Strangulation

Stalk or Intimidate – DV

Threaten or Cause Fear of Harm – DV

Destroy or Damage Property – DV

Contravene / Breach AVO

Coercive Control

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a child need to be physically harmed?

No. A case may be treated as child-related even if no harm occurred. Exposure, presence or perceived risk can be enough for police to escalate the matter.

Will this affect my parenting arrangements?

It can. Bail conditions or AVOs may restrict contact. Family court considerations can also arise. We can advise on how the criminal and family law processes interact.

Can the complainant fix this by withdrawing the allegation?

No. DV offences are prosecuted by the State. However, the complainant’s evidence and views can be relevant to negotiations and outcomes.

Should I speak to police first?

No — get legal advice before speaking with police or attending an interview.

What should I do now?

Contact Lenz Legal to discuss your situation and the best path forward. Early strategy is critical.