Reckless Grievous Bodily Harm - NSW

Reckless infliction of grievous bodily harm (GBH) is one of the most serious non-fatal assault offences in NSW. Police often lay this charge in situations where injuries appear significant or where they believe a serious risk was created, even if the harm was accidental, unintentional, or caused in a fast-moving incident. Once the charge is filed, the matter will usually proceed unless the prosecution accepts that the evidence does not establish recklessness or GBH.

If you have been accused of causing serious injury, it is critical to get legal advice immediately. Reckless GBH carries significant penalties, including the potential for imprisonment, and the way the allegation is recorded in the early stages can strongly influence how the case unfolds.

At Lenz Legal, we act only for the accused. You are presumed innocent unless and until the prosecution proves every element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

What Is Grievous Bodily Harm in NSW

The legal definition of grievous bodily harm

Under section 35 of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), grievous bodily harm (GBH) refers to the most serious category of injury short of death. It includes:

  • Very serious or permanent injuries
  • Injuries that cause long-term impairment
  • Serious or permanent disfigurement
  • Any injury that endangers life
  • A broken bone, which is automatically classified as GBH

The definition is informed by medical evidence, case law, and the statutory wording applied by NSW courts.

How reckless GBH is charged

A person may be charged with reckless GBH if they:

  • Intended to cause actual bodily harm, or
  • Were reckless as to causing actual bodily harm, and
  • In fact caused grievous bodily harm to another person

The prosecution does not need to prove that you intended to cause serious harm.

They only need to prove recklessness as to some harm, and that GBH occurred.

How Reckless GBH Allegations Typically Arise

Reckless GBH charges often emerge from situations that escalate quickly. Common scenarios include:

  • Heated arguments where physical contact results in an unintended serious injury
  • Fights where a single blow causes unexpected harm, such as fractures
  • Incidents involving alcohol, stress or heightened emotions
  • Pushing, pulling or grabbing that leads to a fall or impact with a hard surface
  • Accidental injuries interpreted as deliberate
  • Group situations where actions are unclear and responsibility is disputed

Police may charge the more serious offence initially, especially where the injury looks significant, even if the evidence of recklessness is weak.

What Police Must Prove

To secure a conviction for reckless GBH, the prosecution must prove all of the following elements beyond reasonable doubt.

1. Grievous bodily harm occurred

GBH must be established with evidence. It may include:

  • Long-term impairment
  • Serious disfigurement
  • Injuries that endanger life
  • Broken bones

In many cases, medical reports, scans or treating practitioner notes become crucial.

2. You caused the injury

The prosecution must demonstrate that your actions caused the harm. This may be straightforward in clear situations, but more complex in incidents involving multiple people, alcohol, confusion or limited visibility.

3. You were reckless as to causing actual bodily harm

Recklessness means that you realised some harm might occur but proceeded anyway.

Important clarifications:

  • The law does not require intent to cause serious harm
  • Recklessness must relate to actual bodily harm, not GBH
  • Accident or misjudgement can be a defence if harm was not foreseeable
  • Where actions were reflexive, defensive, accidental or taken in panic, recklessness may not be established.

If even one of the above elements is not proven, the court must find you not guilty.

Evidence Police Rely On

Reckless GBH cases frequently rely on a combination of medical and factual evidence.

Medical evidence

Common forms include

  • Hospital records
  • X-rays or CT scans
  • Treating practitioner summaries
  • Photographs of injuries

Limitations

  • Initial emergency notes may be incomplete
  • Short-term swelling can obscure the true nature of the injury
  • Injuries can be caused in ways that do not reflect the allegation
  • Medical notes often record patient history without verifying accuracy

Body-worn video and witness evidence

What police typically use

  • Footage from attending officers
  • Statements from neighbours, friends or bystanders
  • Recordings of 000 calls

Limitations

  • Witnesses may not have seen the key moment
  • Recollections vary when alcohol or stress is involved
  • Body-worn video often captures only the aftermath, not the cause of the injury

Accused and complainant statements

Factors affecting reliability

  • Inconsistency over time
  • Emotional states
  • Assumptions about intention
  • Pressure during interviews

Our role is to identify where statements are incomplete, inconsistent or unsupported by the physical evidence.

Where This Evidence Commonly Falls Short

  • Medical notes may not prove how the injury occurred
  • The injury may be serious but accidental
  • The complainant’s recollection may not reflect the physical evidence
  • Witness accounts may contradict each other
  • The prosecution may rely on assumptions about intent or recklessness
  • Video evidence may not support the narrative of a deliberate or reckless act

Establishing recklessness, rather than accident or misadventure, is often the central issue.

Possible Defences

Available defences depend on the individual facts but commonly include:

Accident or misadventure

Where the injury occurred unintentionally and without recklessness.

Self-defence

Where actions were taken to protect yourself or another person, and the response was reasonable in the circumstances.

No recklessness

Where harm was not reasonably foreseeable.

Factual dispute

Where the allegation did not occur as described or medical evidence contradicts the prosecution version.

Identification issues

Where it is unclear who caused the injury in group or chaotic situations.

Negotiation or charge reduction

In many cases, charges are withdrawn, downgraded to actual bodily harm, or amended following negotiation.

Sentencing and Penalties

The maximum penalties for reckless GBH are set by statute.

Statutory maximum penalties

Reckless grievous bodily harm

Maximum penalty: 10 years imprisonment

Reckless grievous bodily harm in company

Maximum penalty: 14 years imprisonment

How courts assess seriousness

Courts consider:

  • The nature and extent of the injury
  • Whether the harm is long-term or permanent
  • The level of recklessness
  • Whether alcohol or other influences were involved
  • Your criminal history
  • The surrounding context, including provocation, mutual fighting or self-defence considerations
  • Steps you have taken towards rehabilitation

Domestic violence classification (if applicable)

A DV-flagged offence does not increase the maximum penalty, but it does influence:

  • Bail considerations
  • Risk assessments
  • Sentencing expectations
  • The likelihood of a conviction being recorded
  • The court’s emphasis on community safety

Possible sentencing outcomes

  • Not guilty after a defended hearing
  • Withdrawal or downgrade of the charge
  • Conditional Release Order without conviction
  • Conditional Release Order with conviction
  • Community Correction Order
  • Fines
  • Intensive Correction Order
  • Imprisonment in the most serious cases

For comparison, see Actual Bodily Harm and Common Assault.

How Lenz Legal Can Help

When you contact Lenz Legal, you will deal directly with a criminal defence lawyer who will:

  • Listen carefully to your account
  • Analyse the medical and factual evidence in detail
  • Explain what the prosecution must prove
  • Identify where evidence does not support the allegation
  • Advise you about defences, risks and likely outcomes
  • Negotiate with police or the prosecution where appropriate
  • Appear for you in court and defend your future

We understand the pressure and stigma associated with serious allegations and work to ensure the court sees the full context.

Related Assault and Violent Offences

(Assault – Actual Bodily Harm)

(Common Assault)

(Reckless Wounding)

(Affray)

A link back to the parent page: (Assaults and Violent Offences)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the legal definition of grievous bodily harm?

GBH includes the most serious categories of injury, such as permanent or long-term impairment, serious disfigurement or injuries that endanger life. A broken bone automatically qualifies as GBH.

What is the difference between actual bodily harm and grievous bodily harm?

Actual bodily harm includes less serious injuries such as bruising, swelling or cuts. Grievous bodily harm is reserved for very serious or permanent injuries. Medical evidence is critical in distinguishing between them.

Do I have to intend to cause serious injury?

No. The prosecution only needs to prove recklessness as to causing actual bodily harm, not intent to cause GBH.

Can a reckless GBH charge be downgraded?

Yes. These charges are frequently downgraded to actual bodily harm, especially where medical evidence does not support GBH.

What should I do now?

Get legal advice before speaking to police or attending court. Contact Lenz Legal for confidential guidance about your situation.

Additional Questions People Often Ask About Reckless GBH

Is a broken bone automatically classified as grievous bodily harm?

Yes. Under NSW law, any fracture—no matter how small—is automatically treated as grievous bodily harm. Police and courts do not need medical evidence of long-term impairment for a fracture to qualify as GBH.

Do I need to intend serious injury to be charged with reckless GBH?

No. The prosecution only needs to prove that you were reckless as to causing some harm. They do not need to prove you intended to cause a serious or life-endangering injury.

What is the difference between reckless wounding and reckless GBH?

Reckless wounding requires a break in both layers of the skin. Reckless GBH involves a far more serious level of injury, such as a fracture, permanent impairment, substantial disfigurement or harm that endangers life.

Can police charge reckless GBH without medical evidence?

In some cases they do, particularly where visible injuries appear severe. However, medical confirmation is often essential in court, and the absence of proper evidence can significantly weaken the prosecution case.

Is recklessness difficult for the prosecution to prove?

Yes. The prosecution must prove you foresaw the possibility of causing actual bodily harm—not just minor or accidental contact. This is a higher threshold than many people realise.

Can reckless GBH be downgraded to a less serious charge?

Yes. Many matters are reduced to reckless wounding or assault occasioning actual bodily harm when the injury, intent or evidence does not support a GBH allegation.

What if the complainant exaggerated the injury or its cause?

We regularly identify inconsistencies between alleged injuries and medical records, or between statements and footage. These issues can undermine the allegation and support negotiation or withdrawal.

Will I go to jail for reckless GBH?

Imprisonment is possible because the offence carries significant maximum penalties, especially if charged “in company” or in a domestic context. Outcomes depend heavily on the injury, evidence and personal factors. Many cases resolve without full-time custody.

Why does domestic-violence classification affect the penalty?

A DV label triggers mandatory considerations under NSW sentencing law and can increase the seriousness of the matter in the eyes of the court. It also affects bail, AVOs and future risk assessments.

What should I do now?

Get legal advice before speaking to police or attending court. The earlier you contact Lenz Legal, the more we can do to protect your position and challenge the evidence.